Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

State fragility and international recognition

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis Group

Abstract

This chapter considers how the evolving norms and practices of international recognition relate to the �state fragility� policy agenda. First, the chapter discusses contemporary state failure and state fragility discussion, introducing the �consensual� definition of state fragility and its origins. Second, it directly links the (modern) state fragility discussion with international recognition and statebuilding issues. The chapter shows that the conventional criteria for statehood do not include standards relating to the capacity of state institutions and contain no formal provisions for withdrawing statehood in the event of failure to meet objective standards of state capacity or performance. Nevertheless, there have been academic debates about the possibility of the �decertification� of statehood when states do not meet normative standards set by the �international community�. Finally, the chapter closes on the very recent discussion of state fragility, tying the concept with resilience and risk.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Routledge Handbook of State Recognition

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31