Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Which Audiences Engage With Advocacy Groups on Twitter? Explaining the Online Engagement of Elite, Peer, and Mass Audiences With Advocacy Groups

dc.contributor.authorHalpin, Darren
dc.contributor.authorFraussen, Bert
dc.contributor.authorAckland, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-09T03:50:50Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-01
dc.date.updated2021-11-28T07:24:13Z
dc.description.abstractGaining an audience on social media is an important goal of contemporary policy advocacy. While previous studies demonstrate that advocacy-dedicated nonprofit organizations - what we refer to as advocacy groups - use different social media tools, we still know little about what specific audiences advocacy groups set out to target on social media, and whether those audiences actually engage with these groups. This study fills this gap, deploying survey and digital trace data from Twitter over a 12-month period for the Australian case. We show that while groups target a variety of audiences online, there are differences between group types in their strategic objectives and the extent to which particular audiences engage with them. Business groups appear to target elite audiences more often compared with citizen and professional groups, whereas citizen groups receive more online engagement from mass and peer audiences.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThe paper is part of the AUS_IG project funded by the Australian Research Council grant [DP140104097] to Professor Darren R. Halpin at the Australian National University.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0899-7640en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/255044
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP140104097en_AU
dc.rights© 2020 The Author(s)en_AU
dc.sourceNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterlyen_AU
dc.subjectsocial mediaen_AU
dc.subjectadvocacy groupsen_AU
dc.subjectTwitteren_AU
dc.subjectaudiencesen_AU
dc.subjectengagementen_AU
dc.titleWhich Audiences Engage With Advocacy Groups on Twitter? Explaining the Online Engagement of Elite, Peer, and Mass Audiences With Advocacy Groupsen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage865en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage842en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHalpin, Darren, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationFraussen, Bert, Leiden Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAckland, Robert, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidHalpin, Darren, u5149695en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidAckland, Robert, u4026213en_AU
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor440801 - Australian government and politicsen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB17495en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume50en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1177/0899764020979818en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85097880356
local.publisher.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
0899764020979818.pdf
Size:
148.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: