Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Implications of changing climate and atmospheric CO 2 for grassland fire in south-east Australia: insights using the GRAZPLAN grassland simulation model

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

King, Karen
Cary, Geoffrey
Gill, A Malcom
Moore, Andrew D

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Climate and fuel characteristics influence fire regimes, and both need to be realistically considered in bushfire projections. Previous south-eastern Australian studies have assumed maximum grassland fuel curing (100%) and average fuel load (4.5tha-1). This study is the first to include daily fuel curing and load dynamics, derived from the agricultural pasture growth model GRAZPLAN, in projections of Grassland Fire Danger Index (GFDI) and potential fire-line intensity for future climateCO2 combinations, and for alternate grasslands in the Canberra, Sydney and Melbourne regions. Climate-change projections were characterised by warmer, drier conditions, with atmospheric CO2 concentrations increasing for longer future timeframes. Projected shifts in GFDI and potential fire-line intensity arising from future climateCO2 combinations were small compared with initial difference arising from using realistic GRAZPLAN-derived curing and fuel load values (compared with constant curing and fuel load) for grass dynamics, and this has important implications for the interpretation of earlier studies. Nevertheless, future grass curing and GFDI generally increased and fuel load generally decreased. The net effect on modelled future fire-line intensity was minimal because higher fire danger, and hence spread rate, was often largely compensated for by lower fuel load across the range of modelled grassland types and locations.

Description

Citation

Source

International Journal of Wildland Fire

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31