Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

How Hierarchic Was the Historical East Asian System?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Zhang, Feng

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Palgrave Macmillan Ltd

Abstract

Hierarchy is becoming a central topic in recent International Relations scholarship, and the historical East Asian hierarchy offers an important case study. This article provides a first-cut analysis of the degree variation in regional hierarchy. It distinguishes three levels of Chinese hierarchy in China’s relationships with Korea, Japan and the Mongols in ‘early modern’ East Asia (1368–1800). Regional relations during this period were on the whole more hierarchic than anarchic, but anarchy was also impressive in each of the relationships during certain periods. Theoretically, the analysis suggests questioning the diametrical assumption of hierarchy/anarchy as the organizing principle of international politics. For policy, it notes why a new Chinese hierarchy is unlikely to appear in the foreseeable future. International Politics (2014) 51, 1–22. doi:10.1057/ip.2013.44; published online 24 January 2014

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

International Politics: a journal of transnational issues and global problems

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31