The significance of ICM in the evolution of s 51 (xxxi)
Date
2012
Authors
Macintosh, Andrew
Cunliffe, Jancis
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Law Book Company
Abstract
Over the past 30 years, increasing environmental and natural resource regulation has sparked debate about the protection of private property interests and provision of compensation to those affected by regulatory measures. Where these disputes involve the Commonwealth, it is not uncommon for property owners to reach for s 51(xxxi) of the Australian Constitution to bolster their claims for assistance. In the 2009 decision of ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2009) 240 CLR 140; 170 LGERA 373, the High Court took an important step in clarifying the scope of s 51(xxxi). The decision provides a strong precedent in support of the notion that, for a law to give rise to an acquisition, it must either result in the Commonwealth (or a third party) obtaining an entitlement to possession and control of the plaintiff's property, or effectively sterilise the plaintiff's interest while providing a correlative proprietary benefit to another party. This article reviews the evolution of the High Court's approach to the "constitutional guarantee" and analyses ICM's place in s 51(xxxi) jurisprudence.
Description
Keywords
Keywords: Commonwealth of Nations; compensation system; environmental management; legislation; private land; regulatory framework
Citation
Collections
Source
Environmental and Planning Law Journal
Type
Journal article
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
2037-12-31