The iteration deficit in responsive regulation: Are regulatory ambassadors an answer?
Date
2014
Authors
Braithwaite, John
Hong, Seung-Hun
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Abstract
One reason that regulation is difficult is that repeated encounters between regulator and regulatee are rare. We suggest diplomacy as a model for reconfiguring regulatory institutions in response. Ambassadors for Regulatory Affairs who would be agents for all state regulatory agencies could be based in most large firms and small and medium enterprises that pose unusual regulatory risks. In rural towns, police would be trained as regulatory ambassadors. Just as a US Secretary of State can launch a "diplomatic surge" in Myanmar from 2009, so regulatory surges are possible in market sectors of high risk or high opportunity. We propose strategies of indirect reciprocity as a way in which reciprocity that is only episodic in these strategic ways can promote more general responsiveness. Indirect reciprocity is reciprocity that we do not personally experience, but learn from the experience of a culture. This means that so long as we sustain regulation as a relational as opposed to a purely technocratic process, indirect reciprocity might civilize regulatory compliance in an historical process informed by the theories of Elias and Putnam.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Regulation & Governance
Type
Journal article
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2037-12-31