Baseline prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and subsequent infection following prostate biopsy using empirical or altered prophylaxis: A bias-adjusted meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorRoberts, M
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, Deborah A.
dc.contributor.authorHadway, Paul
dc.contributor.authorDoi, Suhail
dc.contributor.authorGardiner, Robert
dc.contributor.authorPaterson, D L
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-14T23:18:57Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.updated2016-06-14T08:30:54Z
dc.description.abstractTransrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB) is a commonly performed urological procedure. Recent studies suggest that pre-biopsy screening for fluoroquinolone-resistant (FQ-R) pathogens may be useful in reducing post-biopsy infections. We sought to determine the baseline prevalence of fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance in rectal flora and to investigate the relationship between pre-biopsy carriage of FQ-R pathogens and the risk of post-TRUSPB infection. Electronic databases were searched for related literature. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and comparable outcomes prior to meta-analysis (using quality- and random-effects models). Nine studies, representing 2541 patients, were included. The prevalence of FQ resistance was higher (20.4%, 95% CI 18.2-22.6%) in rectal cultures obtained following FQ-based prophylaxis compared with those obtained before (12.8%, 95% CI 10.7-15.0%). Overall infection rates in patients using empirical prophylaxis were higher (3.3%, 95% CI 2.6-4.2%) than in those using altered (targeted/protocol) regimens (0.3%, 95% CI 0-0.9%). Higher infection rates were seen in men with FQ-R rectal cultures (7.1%, 95% CI 4.0-10.5%) than in those with FQ-sensitive (FQ-S) rectal cultures (1.1%, 95% CI 0.5-1.8%). For every 14 men with FQ-R rectal cultures, one additional infection was observed compared with men with FQ-S rectal cultures. Prior FQ use and prior genitourinary infection were significant risk factors for FQ-R colonisation. FQ resistance in rectal flora is a significant predictor of post-TRUSPB infection and may require re-assessment of empirical antimicrobial prophylaxis methods. Altered prophylaxis based on rectal culturing prior to TRUSPB may reduce morbidity and potentially provide economic benefits to health services.
dc.identifier.issn0924-8579
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/102686
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
dc.titleBaseline prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and subsequent infection following prostate biopsy using empirical or altered prophylaxis: A bias-adjusted meta-analysis
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage309
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage301
local.contributor.affiliationRoberts, M, University of Queensland
local.contributor.affiliationWilliamson, Deborah A., University of Auckland
local.contributor.affiliationHadway, Paul, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital
local.contributor.affiliationDoi, Suhail, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationGardiner, Robert, University of Queensland
local.contributor.affiliationPaterson, D L, University of Queensland
local.contributor.authoruidDoi, Suhail, u1005204
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor110300 - CLINICAL SCIENCES
local.identifier.absfor111700 - PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH SERVICES
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB2686
local.identifier.citationvolume43
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.008
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84898000214
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Roberts_Baseline_prevalence_of_2014.pdf
Size:
583.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format