Democratic Theory, the Boundary Problem, and Global Reform

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Nili, Shmuel

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

Abstract

One of the enduring problems in democratic theory is its inability to specify who should belong to the demos. In recent years, several scholars have been arguing that democratic theory should try to overcome this “boundary problem” through different kinds of global reform. I argue, however, that the boundary problem is an analytical distraction in thinking about global reform. I begin with general doubts as to whether the boundary problem can ground global reform. I then join the developing conversation on Arash Abizadeh’s and Robert Goodin’s boundary problem arguments. I offer new reasons for why both arguments encounter fundamental difficulties. I conclude by anticipating the concern that my argument does not take the need for global reform seriously enough.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

The Review of Politics

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31