Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Response variability and information transfer in directional neurons of the mammalian horizontal optokinetic system.

dc.contributor.authorClifford, Colin W.G.
dc.contributor.authorIbbotson, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T23:15:41Z
dc.date.available2015-12-13T23:15:41Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.date.updated2015-12-12T08:44:33Z
dc.description.abstractThis study is concerned with how information about the direction of visual motion is encoded by motion-sensitive neurons. Motion-sensitive neurons are usually studied using stimuli unchanging in speed and direction over several seconds. Recently, it has been suggested that neuronal responses to more naturalistic stimuli cannot be understood on the basis of experiments with constant-motion stimuli (de Ruyter van Steveninck et al, 1997). We measured the variability and information content of spike trains recorded from directional neurons in the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) of the wallaby, Macropus eugenii, in response to constant and time-varying motion. While the NOT forms part of the mammalian optokinetic system, we have shown previously that the responses of its directional neurons resemble those of insect H1 in many respects (Ibbotson et al., 1994). We find that directional neurons in the wallaby NOT respond with lower variability and higher rates of information transmission to time-varying stimuli than to constant motion. The difference in response variability is predicted by an inhomogeneous Poisson model of neuronal spiking incorporating an absolute refractory period of 2 ms during which no subsequent spike can be fired. Refractoriness imposes structure on the spike train, reducing variability (de Ruyter van Steveninck and Bialek, 1988; Berry and Meister, 1998). A given refractory period has a greater impact when firing rates are high, as for the responses of NOT neurons to time-varying stimuli. It is in just these cases that variability in experimentally observed spike trains is lowest. Thus, differences in response variability do not necessarily imply that different models are required to predict neuronal responses to constant- and time-varying motion stimuli.
dc.identifier.issn0952-5238
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/88998
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.sourceVisual Neuroscience
dc.subjectKeywords: animal experiment; article; controlled study; mammal; motion; nerve cell; nerve cell stimulation; nonhuman; optic tract; priority journal; refractory period; spike wave; vision; visual stimulation; Animals; Electrophysiology; Macropodidae; Motion Percepti Motion; Neural coding; Nucleus of the optic tract; Vision; Wallaby
dc.titleResponse variability and information transfer in directional neurons of the mammalian horizontal optokinetic system.
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage215
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage207
local.contributor.affiliationClifford, Colin W.G., University of Sydney
local.contributor.affiliationIbbotson, Michael, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidIbbotson, Michael, u8912836
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor110906 - Sensory Systems
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub18882
local.identifier.citationvolume17
local.identifier.doi10.1017/S0952523800172037
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-0034011909
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads