How to Think about the Modularity of Mind Reading

dc.contributor.authorCurrie, Gregory
dc.contributor.authorSterelny, Kim
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T23:18:29Z
dc.date.available2015-12-13T23:18:29Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.date.updated2015-12-12T08:57:02Z
dc.description.abstractIt has been suggested that the fixation of beliefs about people's beliefs, desires and intentions is modularized. We argue that this is unlikely. We argue that there is modularity lower down: social-intentional 'markers' are produced by an encapsulated mechanism intermediate between perception and belief-fixation, and that these markers make a distinctive contribution to the fixation of beliefs about the mental. But belief fixation itself is not modular. Finally, we suggest some complications to our simple picture, and some ways in which our thesis might shed light on pathologies of social understanding.
dc.identifier.issn0031-8094
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/90203
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.sourcePhilosophical Quarterly, The
dc.titleHow to Think about the Modularity of Mind Reading
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue199
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage160
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage145
local.contributor.affiliationCurrie, Gregory, University of Nottingham
local.contributor.affiliationSterelny, Kim, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidSterelny, Kim, u8401578
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor220312 - Philosophy of Cognition
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub20502
local.identifier.citationvolume50
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-0007506814
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads