What does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education

dc.contributor.authorMaccora, Janet
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorAnstey, Kaarin
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-27T00:56:25Z
dc.date.available2024-02-27T00:56:25Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.updated2022-10-09T07:17:39Z
dc.description.abstractLow education is considered an important modifiable risk factor for dementia worldwide, despite the lack of a formal consensus definition of low education. The primary aim of this systematic review was to document and address the inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education in dementia studies. A secondary aim was to consider the dose of education required to reduce dementia risk. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO with registration ID CRD42018096168. CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycInfo, and Pubmed databases were searched using terms related to education, dementia and/or MCI, and incidence. Studies were eligible for inclusion if a risk ratio for education and any dementia, Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Vascular Dementia (VaD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) was reported in a population cognitively healthy at baseline. Sample sizes for 65 studies meeting selection criteria ranged from 152 to 12,881, representing populations from 24 countries. Risk of bias, assessed using a tool designed specifically for dementia risk studies, was found to be medium or low for all studies. There were 23 continuous, 29 dichotomous, and 31 categorical operationalisations of education reported. Random effects meta-analyses from continuous operationalisations suggested each year of education reduced risk by eight percent for AD (95% CI:5–12%) and seven percent for any dementia (95% CI:6–9%). Dichotomous operationalisations indicated an increased risk for low education of 45% (95% CI:29–63%) for any dementia and 85% (95% CI:56–118%) for AD, however definitions of low education were heterogeneous, ranging from zero to 12 years. There were too few studies to produce summary ratios for VaD or MCI. We conclude that, while the evidence of an association between low education and dementia incidence is robust, inconsistency in the definition, measurement and operationalisation of education hinders the translation of this evidence into practical policy recommendations to reduce dementia risk.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipJM is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship and Supplementary PhD Scholarship Awards from the ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR) and Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA). KJA is funded by NHMRC Research Fellowship number 1102694, RP is funded by the NHMRC Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration. We acknowledge funding from the NHMRC Dementia Collaborative Research Centre and the ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2352-8273en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/313958
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_AU
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.en_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1102694en_AU
dc.rights© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceSSM - Population Healthen_AU
dc.subjectEducationen_AU
dc.subjectDementia risken_AU
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_AU
dc.subjectModifiable risk factors for dementiaen_AU
dc.subjectDementia risk methodologyen_AU
dc.subjectSocial determinants of dementia risken_AU
dc.titleWhat does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising educationen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage19en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMaccora, Janet, Neuroscience Research Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationPeters, Ruth, University of New South Walesen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAnstey, Kaarin, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidAnstey, Kaarin, u4038535en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor420200 - Epidemiologyen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB27851en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume12en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100654en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85097404877
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.elsevier.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S2352827320302913-main.pdf
Size:
16.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: