An improved measurement of the Ca²⁺-binding affinity of fluorescent Ca²⁺ indicators

Abstract

Fluorescent Ca2+ indicators are widely used to measure the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in living cells, including neurons. By calibrating an indicator in solutions that mimic the main ionic constituents of the actual cytoplasm, [Ca2+]i can be determined from the measured fluorescence intensity. However, different studies have reported considerably different Ca2+-binding affinities (Kd) for the same indicator, even though they used calibrating solutions with similar compositions. In this paper, we present a method to accurately determine the Kd values of non-ratiometric Ca2+ indicators in solutions that mimicked a standard patch-clamp internal solution. The free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]) in these solutions, which was set by either EGTA or HEDTA, was measured with a Ca2+-selective macroelectrode. We found that such a measurement was critical for an accurate calibration of the Ca2+ indicators. The Kd values of OGB-1, OGB-6F, fluo-5F, and fluo-4FF were 0.26 #177; 0.01, 8.7 #177; 0.4, 1.00 #177; 0.05, and 23.0 ± 0.7 µM, respectively. Calculating [Ca2+] with Maxchelator, a widely used computer program, led to a significant underestimation of the Kd values of OGB-6F, fluo-5F, and fluo-4FF. This is because the purity of EGTA was considerably less than that advertised by the manufacturer. In addition, the Kd value of HEDTA was overestimated by Maxchelator. Therefore, besides batch-to-batch variations, the fact that [Ca2+] in the calibrating solutions of many studies was estimated with Maxchelator is very likely a reason for the different published values of Kd of Ca2+ indicators. Using a reaction-diffusion model to reproduce Ca2+ rises in a nerve terminal, we further showed that incorrect calibration of fluorescent Ca2+ indicators can underlie the large variation of the endogenous Ca2+ binding ratio between different types of excitatory synapses. Show more