Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The Utility and Comparative Incremental Validity of the MMPI-2 and Trauma Symptom Inventory Validity Scales in the Detection of Feigned PTSD

Date

Authors

Efendov, Adele A

Sellbom, Martin

Bagby, R Michael

Publisher

American Psychological Association

Abstract

The authors examined the comparative predictive capacity of the Trauma Symptom Inventory (TSI) Atypical Response Scale (ATR) and the standard set of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) fake-bad validity scales (i.e., F, FB, Fp, FBS) to

Keywords

Keywords: adult; article; comparative study; controlled study; diagnostic accuracy; female; human; injury; major clinical study; male; malingering; Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory; occupational accident; posttraumatic stress disorder; psychological rati malingering; Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2; posttraumatic stress disorder; Trauma Symptom Inventory

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/1885/29825

Collections

ANU Research Publications

Source

Psychological Assessment

Type

Journal article

DOI

10.1037/a0013870

Restricted until

2037-12-31

Downloads

File

Description

01_Efendov_The_Utility_and_Comparative_2008.pdf (77.64 KB)