The Tort liability of public authorities: a comparative analysis
Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to explore, and offer an explanation of, a striking difference
between US law, on the one hand, and English and Australian law, on the other, in relation
to the tort liability of public authorities, namely, the central role of the concept of ‘ sovereign
immunity ’ in US law as compared with English and Australian law. The proffered explanation is in terms of a distinction between two models of the tort liability of public authorities, namely, a private law model and a public law model. To explain this distinction it is
necessary, fi rst, to contrast pure and hybrid versions of these two models.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
The common law of obligations: divergence and unity
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2099-12-31
Downloads
File
Description