Evaluating a dichotomized measure of self- reported hearing loss against gold standard audiometry: prevalence estimates and age bias in a pooled national data set
Loading...
Date
Authors
Kiely, Kim M.
Gopinath, Bamini
Mitchell, Paul
Browning, Colette J.
Anstey, Kaarin
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate a harmonized binary measure of self-reported
hearing loss against gold standard audiometry in an older adult population.
Method: Seven nationally representative population-based studies were
harmonized and pooled (n = 23,001). Self-report items were recoded into
a dichotomous format. Audiometric hearing loss was defined by averaged
pure-tone thresholds greater than 25-decibel hearing level in the better ear.
We compared age and sex stratified prevalence rates of hearing loss estimated
by self-report and audiometric measures. Results: Overall, 56% of
men and 43% of women had audiometric hearing loss. There were moderate
associations between self-reported and audiometric hearing loss. However,
prevalence based on self-report was overestimated for adults aged below 70 years and underestimated for adults aged above 75. Discussion: Self-report
of hearing loss is insensitive to age effects and does not provide a reliable
basis for estimating prevalence of age-related hearing loss, although may indicate perceived hearing disability.
Description
Keywords
age-related hearing loss, presbycusis, harmonization, data pooling, the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ALSA), the Australian Longitudinal Study of Women’s Health (ALSWH), the Blue Mountains Eye Study (BMES), the Canberra Longitudinal Study (CLS), the Melbourne Longitudinal Studies on Healthy Ageing Program (MELSHA), the Path Through Life Project (PATH), the Sydney Older Persons Study (SOPS)
Citation
Collections
Source
Journal of Aging and Health 24.3 (2012): 439-458