Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Economic evaluation of interventions designed to reduce Clostridium difficile infection

dc.contributor.authorBrain, David C
dc.contributor.authorYakob, Laith
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorRiley, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorClements, Archie
dc.contributor.authorHalton, Kate
dc.contributor.authorGraves, Nicholas
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-27T03:00:55Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T03:00:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-03
dc.date.updated2020-11-23T11:39:27Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Healthcare decision-makers are increasingly expected to balance increasing demand for health services with a finite budget. The role of economic evaluation in healthcare is increasing and this research provides decision-makers with new information about the management of Clostridium difficile infection, from an economic perspective. Methods: A model-based economic evaluation was undertaken to identify the most cost-effective healthcare intervention relating to the reduction of Clostridium difficile transmission. Efficacy evidence was synthesised from the literature and was used to inform the effectiveness of both bundled approaches and stand-alone interventions, where appropriate intervention combinations were coupled together. Changes in health outcomes were estimated by combining information about intervention effectiveness and its subsequent impact on quality of life. Results: A bundled approach of improving hand hygiene and environmental cleaning produces the best combination of increased health benefits and cost-savings. It has the highest mean net monetary benefit when compared to all other interventions. This intervention remains the optimal decision under different clinical circumstances, such as when mortality rate and patient length of stay are increased. Bundled interventions offered the best opportunity for health improvements. Conclusion: These findings provide healthcare decision-makers with novel information about the allocation of scarce resources relating to Clostridium difficile. If investments are not made in interventions that clearly yield gains in health outcomes, the allocation and use of scarce healthcare resources is inappropriate and improvements in health outcomes will be forgone.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/251222
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_AU
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_AU
dc.rights© 2018 Brain et alen_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International)en_AU
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourcePLOS ONE (Public Library of Science)en_AU
dc.titleEconomic evaluation of interventions designed to reduce Clostridium difficile infectionen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage15en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBrain, David C, Queensland University of Technolgyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationYakob, Laith, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicineen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBarnett, Adrian, Queensland University of Technologyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationRiley, Thomas, University of Western Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationClements, Archie, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHalton, Kate , Queensland University of Technologyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGraves, Nicholas, Queensland University of Technologyen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidClements, Archie, u5611518en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor111700 - PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH SERVICESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor111706 - Epidemiologyen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB9242en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume13en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0190093en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85039999297
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.plos.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Brain_Economic_evaluation_of_2018.pdf
Size:
1.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format