Comparative randomised trial of online cognitive -behavioural therapy and an information website for depression: 12-month outcomes
Loading...
Date
Authors
Mackinnon, Andrew
Griffiths, Kathleen
Christensen, Helen
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Abstract
Background: An earlier paper reported positive outcomes immediately following access to a cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) internet intervention and a depression information website. Aims: To determine 6-month and 12-month outcomes of the interventions relative to a placebo control condition. Method: Participants allocated to the depression information website condition, the CBT internet intervention and the placebo control condition were followed up at 6 and 12 months by survey. The primary outcome measure was the Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression (CES-D) scale. Of 525 participants recruited, 79% completed their assigned intervention and 60% were retained at 12-month follow-up. Attrition was handled using mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA. Results: Both the CBT site and depression information sites were associated with statistically significant benefits in CES-D score reduction compared with controls at post-test. At 6-months follow-up, the reduction seen for the people allocated to the CBT arm remained significant, whereas that for the depression information website arm was not. At 12 months, both active interventions were statistically significantly superior to the control condition. Conclusions: There is some evidence that benefits of these brief internet interventions are retained beyond their endpoint. The impact of human support provided by interviewers in the trial must be considered when comparing these outcomes to routine use of both internet interventions. Declaration of interest: H.C. and K.G. are authors and developers of the MoodGYM and BluePages websites but derive no personal or financial benefit from their operation. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
British Journal of Psychiatry