Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Role of direct oral anticoagulants in gastrointestinal cancerassociated thrombosis "gpractical issues in clinical practice"—narrative review

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Jain, Ankit
Amira , Mohammad
Manoharan, Sathya
Mahmood, Shahid
Yip, Desmond

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

AME Publishing Company

Abstract

Objective: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are now considered an effective treatment option for cancer associated thrombosis (CAT). There are still controversies in the use of DOACs in CAT associated with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Background: Patients with GI malignancies and CAT present several unique management challenges. Factors such as the risk of bleeding from intact luminal primary, impact on absorption and efficacy of the DOACs due to altered anatomy, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, the potential drug to drug interactions need to be considered when prescribing DOACs in CAT associated with GI malignancies. Methods: The landmark randomised controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews and observational studies (OSs) of real-world data comparing DOACs with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in treating CAT comprised heterogeneous groups of tumour sites with limited numbers of patients with GI malignancies. This article reviews the available evidence on outcomes of the subset of CAT associated with GI malignancies in recent RCTs. Conclusions: Future prospective trials need to evaluate the impact of the factors mentioned above in the efficacy of DOACs in preventing and treating CATs in specific subsets of GI malignancies. Until more evidence is available, LMWH is a more reasonable choice in selected subgroups of CAT in GI malignancies.

Description

Citation

Source

Annals of Palliative Medicine

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Restricted until

2099-12-31

Downloads

abcd