Price Premiums for Organic Food from Australia and China
Loading...
Date
Authors
Paull, John
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
International Society of Organic Agriculture Research (ISOFAR
Abstract
Australian consumers (N=221) were surveyed to establish their valuations of food, based on provenance, organic status and eco-labelling. For Chinese produce Organic attracted a 6.4% premium, and Certified Organic a 11.6% premium. This compares to Australian produce which attracted a 7.9% premium for Organic, and a 16.5% premium for Certified Organic. For Chinese produce Natural added a 1.7% premium and Eco a 2.9% premium, compared to Australian produce which added a 2.6% premium for Natural and a 2.8% premium for Eco. Chinese produce was devalued by 20.6%, compared to Australian produce (alternatively Australian produce attracted a premium of 26.0% over Chinese product). Respondents who volunteered comments, indicated they were “dubious of” or lacked “trust” in the labelling of food from China; affordability and buying “local” were also issues mentioned by respondents. Certified Organic produce offers an opportunity for Chinese producers to improve their return for effort, and raise the status of their produce. Adjunctive labelling can add 14.6% to consumer valuations of Chinese produce.
Description
Citation
Paull, J., 2008, "Price Premiums for Organic Food from Australia and China", Proceedings: Cultivating the Future Based on Science, Second Scientific Conference of the International Society of Organic Agriculture Research (ISOFAR), Modena, Italy, 18-20 June, V2: 412 -415.
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Proceedings: Cultivating the Future Based on Science, Second Scientific Conference of the International Society of Organic Agriculture Research (ISOFAR), Modena, Italy, 18-20 June 2008
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description