Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

On the cohomology theory of knot groups

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Vlagsma, Cornelis Paul

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

This thesis deals with the cohomology theory of groups, attempting, in particular to find a proof of the following conjecture. Conjecture: All knot groups have cohomological dimension 2. An introduction is given to the theory of knots and knot groups, together with the cohomology theory of a group. A proof of the conjecture for all knot groups has not been found. However, using known results from the theory of groups in general and knot groups in particular, the following classes of knot groups are shown to satisfy the conjecture. a) The class of knot groups which have a presentation involving only one relator. b) The class of groups of alternating knots. c) The class of groups of non-alternating knots with less than ten (10) crossings. d) The class of knot groups whose commutator subgroup is free. A method developed by myself, under the instigation of my supervisor Dr. I.M.S. Dey, shows a necessary and sufficient condition for a knot group to satisfy the conjecture. Using the condition, the following knots are shown to have groups with cohomological dimension 2, provided the assumption made in section 4.6 is correct. e) The group of the Kinoshita Terasaka knot. f) The groups of knots as shown in Fig.l below. g) The groups of knots as shown in Fig. 2 below. A proof for the assumption referred to above has not yet been found. The assumption seems plausible, and can probably be proved using advanced techniques of algebraic topology, with which the author is not familiar at this time.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads