Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A Supreme Court or a Constitutional Jirga?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Cheema, Moeen

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Routledge

Abstract

This chapter investigates the role that the Supreme Court has played in the context of an increasing democratic deficit and the emergence of what is being widely referred to as a civil-military ‘hybrid’ regime in Pakistan. It closely analyses high-profile constitutional cases before and after the 2018 elections, and the resulting transfer of power to the incumbent government. The chapter argues that in such cases involving matters of high constitutional law and politics the apex court has developed a method to temporarily reduce the political and inter-institutional tensions by mediating between the various power centres and reaching intermediate outcomes, rather than principled peremptory decisions. While such judicial intervention temporarily reduces political strains, it ultimately enables the hybrid regime to assert its dominance under the cover of judicial oversight, contributing to autocratization in Pakistan.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Routledge Handbook of Autocratization in South Asia

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Creative Commons Attribution licence

DOI

Restricted until