Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A review of preference-based measures for the assessment of quality of life in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy

dc.contributor.authorMpundu-Kaambwa, Christine
dc.contributor.authorChen, Gang
dc.contributor.authorHuynh, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorRusso, Remo
dc.contributor.authorRatcliffe, Julie
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-17T22:26:16Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.updated2020-11-23T11:30:57Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Purpose To examine the psychometric properties and suitability for use within the context of cerebral palsy research in children and adolescents of generic preference-based outcome measures (PROMs). Methods Nine electronic databases were searched in this systematic review. The consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist were used to measure the psychometric properties of the PROMs. A meta-analysis was used to pool correlation coefficients for convergent validity using the Schmidt–Hunter method. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I-squared statistic (I2). Results Four preference-based PROMs were identified from eight studies: Health Utilities Index—Mark 2 and 3 (HUI-2 and HUI-3, respectively), the Assessment Quality of Life-4 dimension (AQoL-4D) and the EuroQol-5 dimension 3 level (EQ-5D-3L). Only the HUI system was primarily developed for application with children/adolescents though health-state values for scoring the PROM were elicited from adults. The HUI-3 covered the most relevant constructs though it excludes important modules of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) such as activity limitations and participation restrictions. In terms of psychometric properties, evidence was presented for only five of COSMIN measurement properties: reliability (HUI3), measurement error (HUI-3), content validity (HUI-2 and HUI-3), Hypotheses testing (HUI-3 and AQoL-4D) and criterion validity (HUI-3). No papers reported on internal consistency, structural validity, cross-cultural validity or responsiveness of the preference-based measures in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Conclusions This review highlights the dearth in studies using preference-based PROMs to measure HRQOL associated with cerebral palsy in children and adolescents. The HUI-3 demonstrated the strongest psychometric properties, though it does not cover all dimensions relevant to this population.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipCM is supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0962-9343en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/250958
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishersen_AU
dc.rights© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018en_AU
dc.sourceQuality of Life Researchen_AU
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_AU
dc.subjectUtilityen_AU
dc.subjectInstrumentsen_AU
dc.subjectChilden_AU
dc.subjectAdolescenten_AU
dc.subjectCerebral palsyen_AU
dc.titleA review of preference-based measures for the assessment of quality of life in children and adolescents with cerebral palsyen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1799en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1781en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMpundu-Kaambwa, Christine , University of South Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationChen, Gang, Monash Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHuynh, Elisabeth, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationRusso, Remo , Monash Business School, Monash Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationRatcliffe, Julie, University of South Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidHuynh, Elisabeth, u1068004en_AU
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor140208 - Health Economicsen_AU
local.identifier.absseo920204 - Evaluation of Health Outcomesen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4102339xPUB418en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume27en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1007/s11136-018-1837-0en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.springernature.com/gp/products/journalsen_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Mpundu-Kaambwa_A_review_of_preference-based_2018.pdf
Size:
1.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format