Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Optimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty

dc.contributor.authorJotzo, Frank
dc.contributor.authorPezzey, John (Jack)
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T22:11:17Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.date.updated2015-12-08T07:39:53Z
dc.description.abstractUncertainty is an obstacle for commitments under cap and trade schemes for emission permits. We assess how well intensity targets, where each country's permit allocation is indexed to its future realized GDP, can cope with uncertainties in international greenhouse emissions trading. We present some empirical foundations for intensity targets and derive a simple rule for the optimal degree of indexation to GDP. Using an 18-region simulation model of a cooperative, global cap-and-trade treaty in 2020 under multiple uncertainties and endogenous commitments, we show that optimal intensity targets could reduce the cost of uncertainty and achieve significant increases in global abatement. The optimal degree of indexation to GDP would vary greatly between countries, including super-indexation in some advanced countries, and partial indexation for most developing countries. Standard intensity targets (with one-to-one indexation) would also improve the overall outcome, but to a lesser degree and not in all individual cases. Although target indexation is no magic wand for a future global climate treaty, gains from reduced cost uncertainty and the potential for more stringent environmental commitments could justify the increased complexity and other potential downsides of intensity targets.
dc.identifier.issn0924-6460
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/29724
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers
dc.sourceEnvironmental and Resource Economics
dc.subjectKeywords: Computer simulation; Environmental protection; Gas emissions; International cooperation; International trade; Public policy; Climate policy; Emissions trading; Intensity targets; Greenhouse gases; abatement cost; emissions trading; environmental policy; g Climate policy; Emissions trading; Intensity targets; Optimality; Simulation modelling; Uncertainty
dc.titleOptimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage284
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage259
local.contributor.affiliationJotzo, Frank, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationPezzey, John (Jack), College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidJotzo, Frank, u3902640
local.contributor.authoruidPezzey, John (Jack), u9909755
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor140205 - Environment and Resource Economics
local.identifier.ariespublicationu9205081xPUB67
local.identifier.citationvolume38
local.identifier.doi10.1007/s10640-006-9078-z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-34548162867
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Jotzo_Optimal_intensity_targets_for_2007.pdf
Size:
332 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format