Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Investigation of neurobiological responses to theta burst stimulation during recovery from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Coyle, Hannah
Bailey, Neil
Ponsford, Jennie
Hoy, Kate E.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

Objective The ability of the brain to recover following neurological insult is of interest for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) populations. Investigating whether non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) can modulate neurophysiology and cognition may lead to the development of therapeutic interventions post injury. The purpose of this study was to investigate neurobiological effects of one session of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in participants recovering from mTBI. Method Changes to neurophysiology were assessed with electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with EEG (TMS-EEG). Digit span working memory accuracy assessed cognitive performance. 30 patients were assessed within one-month of sustaining a mTBI and 26 demographically matched controls were assessed. Participants were also assessed at 3-months (mTBI: N = 21, control: N = 26) and 6-months (mTBI: N = 15, control: N = 24). Results Analyses demonstrated iTBS did not reliably modulate neurophysiological activity, and no differences in cognitive performance were produced by iTBS at any assessment time-point. Conclusions Factors responsible for our null results are unclear. Possible limitations to our experimental design are discussed. Significance Our findings suggest additional research is required to establish the effects of iTBS on plasticity following mTBI, prior to therapeutic application.

Description

Citation

Source

Behavioural Brain Research

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31