Australia as a branch office economy

dc.contributor.authorGarnaut, Ross
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T23:27:40Z
dc.date.available2015-12-13T23:27:40Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.date.updated2015-12-12T09:51:01Z
dc.description.abstractThere has been a recent tendency for the location of executive leadership of companies engaged in natural resource-based production to shift from Australia to the Northern Hemisphere cities. What is the cause of this tendency? Does it matter to Australian welfare? If it matters, is there any action by Government that can weaken the tendency or reduce its negative effects? Direct regulatory intervention to prevent relocation of corporate headquarters is unlikely to increase Australian welfare. However, reforms to reduce transport and telecommunications costs and to increase the attractions of residence in Australia of people with skills that are important in executive leadership would have positive effects.
dc.identifier.issn1364-985X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/93313
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.sourceAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
dc.subjectKeywords: industrial location; national economy; office location; welfare impact; Australia
dc.titleAustralia as a branch office economy
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage461
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage447
local.contributor.affiliationGarnaut, Ross, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.authoremailrepository.admin@anu.edu.au
local.contributor.authoruidGarnaut, Ross, u8104073
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor149903 - Heterodox Economics
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub26731
local.identifier.citationvolume46
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-0036724171
local.identifier.uidSubmittedByMigrated
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads