Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Modularity patterns in mammalian domestication: Assessing developmental hypotheses for diversification

dc.contributor.authorWilson, Laura
dc.contributor.authorBalcarcel, Ana
dc.contributor.authorGeiger, Madeleine
dc.contributor.authorHeck, Laura
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T00:51:34Z
dc.date.available2023-02-27T00:51:34Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2021-12-19T07:17:06Z
dc.description.abstractThe neural crest hypothesis posits that selection for tameness resulted in mild alterations to neural crest cells during embryonic development, which directly or indirectly caused the appearance of traits associated with the "domestication syndrome" (DS). Although representing an appealing unitary explanation for the generation of domestic phenotypes, support for this hypothesis from morphological data and for the validity of the DS remains a topic of debate. This study used the frameworks of morphological integration and modularity to assess patterns that concern the embryonic origin of the skull and issues around the neural crest hypothesis. Geometric morphometric landmarks were used to quantify cranial trait interactions between six pairs of wild and domestic mammals, comprising representatives that express between five and 17 of the traits included in the DS, and examples from each of the pathways by which animals entered into relationships with humans. We predicted the presence of neural crest vs mesoderm modular structure to the cranium, and that elements in the neural crest module would show lower magnitudes of integration and higher disparity in domestic forms compared to wild forms. Our findings support modular structuring based on tissue origin (neural crest, mesoderm) modules, along with low module integration magnitudes for neural crest cell derived cranial elements, suggesting differential capacity for evolutionary response among those elements. Covariation between the neural crest and mesoderm modules accounted for major components of shape variation for most domestic/wild pairs. Contra to our predictions, however, we find domesticates share similar integration magnitudes to their wild progenitors, indicating that higher disparity in domesticates is not associated with magnitude changes to integration among either neural crest or mesoderm derived elements. Differences in integration magnitude among neural crest and mesoderm elements across species suggest that developmental evolution preserves a framework that promotes flexibility under the selection regimes of domestication.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipM.R.S.-V. is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant No. 31003A–169395en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2056-3744en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/286441
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserteden_AU
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FT200100822en_AU
dc.rights© 2021 The authorsen_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution licenceen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceEvolution Lettersen_AU
dc.subjectEvolvabilityen_AU
dc.subjectmorphological disparityen_AU
dc.subjectselectionen_AU
dc.subjectshape variationen_AU
dc.subjectskull,en_AU
dc.subjecttamenessen_AU
dc.titleModularity patterns in mammalian domestication: Assessing developmental hypotheses for diversificationen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage396en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage385en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWilson, Laura, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBalcarcel, Ana, Palaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurichen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGeiger, Madeleine, Palaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurichen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHeck, Laura, Palaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurichen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSanchez-Villagra, Marcelo R., Palaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurichen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidWilson, Laura, u1105651en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor310914 - Vertebrate biologyen_AU
local.identifier.absfor310403 - Biological adaptationen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB20770en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume5en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1002/evl3.231en_AU
local.identifier.thomsonID000662797500001
local.publisher.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Modularity patterns.pdf
Size:
787.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: