Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Supervised or Unsupervised Rehabilitation After Total Hip Replacement Provides Similar Improvements for Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Coulter, Corinne
Perriman, Diana
Neeman, Teresa
Smith, Paul
Scarvell, Jennifer M

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

W B Saunders Co

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether patients do better with unsupervised (home-based) physiotherapy or in an outpatient setting. Setting: Acute care public hospital in the region, supporting a population of ∼540,000. Design: Single-blind randomized controlled trial. Participants: Adult patients (N=98) after unilateral elective total hip replacement (THR) were randomly assigned to a supervised (center-based) exercise (n=56) or a unsupervised (home-based) exercise (n=42) program and followed for 6 months postsurgery. Interventions: The supervised group attended a 4-week outpatient rehabilitation program supervised by a physiotherapist. The unsupervised group was given written and pictorial instructions to perform rehabilitation independently at home. Main Outcome Measures: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; Short-Form 36-item Health Questionnaire (SF-36) mental and physical component summary measures; University of California, Los Angeles activity scale; and timed Up and Go test. Results: There were no differences between the groups for any measure. The overall differences between the adjusted means were as follows: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], -6.8 to 5.7); SF-36 physical component summary, 0.8 (95% CI, -6.5 to 8.1); SF-36 mental component summary, 1.7 (95% CI, -4.1 to 7.4); University of California, Los Angeles activity scale, 0.3 (95% CI, 5.2 to 6.1); and timed Up and Go test, 0 seconds (95% CI, -1.4 to 1.3s). Conclusions: The results demonstrated that outcomes in response to rehabilitation after THR are clinically and statistically similar whether the program was supervised or not. The results suggest that early rehabilitation programs can be effectively delivered unsupervised in the home to low-risk patients discharged home after THR. However, the relative effect of late-stage rehabilitation was not tested

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31
abcd