Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Comparison between Two Mixed Reality Environments as a Teleoperation Interface

dc.contributor.authorManuaba, Bagus
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Ken
dc.contributor.authorGedeon, Tamas (Tom)
dc.coverage.spatialShanghai China
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:20:48Z
dc.date.createdMay 9-13 2011
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T11:30:37Z
dc.description.abstractAn important aspect of teleoperation is situational awareness through visualization. The actual operation and control of a remote machine must be supported by an interface which provides enough information through visualization from a remote location to complete a task. This can be achieved with a Mixed Reality (MR) environment. The concept is to combine information from the real world and a virtual world. An experiment was conducted to assess the differences between two platforms and to determine interface features required to maximize operator performance and satisfaction. The result indicates that both mixed reality environments tested were suitable for teleoperation where sufficient information to perform the task could be modeled in the virtual world. However, one of the environments turned out to be superior where the task required information in the video but not modeled in the virtual environment. The preferred environment provided overlays on the video that were updated live as the model was manipulated where the other environment updated video overlays on completion of the manipulation.
dc.identifier.isbn9781612843865
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/52084
dc.publisherIEEE Robotics and Automation Society
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2011)
dc.sourceIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2011 proceedings
dc.subjectActual operation
dc.subjectMixed reality
dc.subjectMixed-reality environment
dc.subjectOperator performance
dc.subjectRemote location
dc.subjectRemote machines
dc.subjectSituational awareness
dc.subjectTeleoperation interface
dc.subjectVirtual worlds
dc.subjectInteractive computer graphics
dc.subjectRemote control
dc.subjectRobotics
dc.subjectVisualization
dc.titleComparison between Two Mixed Reality Environments as a Teleoperation Interface
dc.typeConference paper
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage6
local.contributor.affiliationManuaba, Bagus, College of Engineering and Computer Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationTaylor, Ken , College of Engineering and Computer Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationGedeon, Tamas (Tom), College of Engineering and Computer Science, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidManuaba, Bagus, u4644466
local.contributor.authoruidTaylor, Ken , u1812546
local.contributor.authoruidGedeon, Tamas (Tom), u4088783
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor080399 - Computer Software not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.absseo970108 - Expanding Knowledge in the Information and Computing Sciences
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4963866xPUB238
local.identifier.doi10.1109/ICRA.2011.5979828
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84871673168
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Manuaba_Comparison_between_Two_Mixed_2011.pdf
Size:
878.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format