Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Determining the Punishment of Sex Criminals in Confederation Era Canada: A Matter of National Policy

dc.contributor.authorStrange, Carolyn
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-09T12:25:52Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.updated2022-08-07T08:17:55Z
dc.description.abstractCriminal justice was a critical component of nation building, which culminated in Canada’s adoption of a federal Criminal Code in 1892. However, the connections between criminal law reform and the Dominion’s fortunes began in 1869, when penal policy was first formulated and debated on a national stage. At that point, the mandatory sentence of death applied to rape and carnal knowledge of a girl under ten years of age. This article analyzes why and how Canada’s early harsh stance, promoted by John A. Macdonald, gave way, within a decade, to milder penalties. It argues that existing explanations, which focus on the “civilization” of punishment and the racist character of penal policy, must be augmented by an analysis of regional tensions, clashes between the judiciary and the legislature, and the factors at play in individual capital cases (twenty-six in total, from 1867–77). Executive discretion, while constitutional, ultimately proved to be a liability in the broader project of nation building.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0008-3755en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/159391
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceJournal: Canadian Historical Review (ISSN: 0008-3755, ESSN: 1710-1093) RoMEO: This is a RoMEO yellow journal Paid OA: A paid open access option is available for this journal. Author's Pre-print: green tick author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing) Author's Post-print: grey tick subject to Restrictions below, author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) Restrictions: If funded by the Canadian Tri-Agency 12 months embargo Publisher's Version/PDF: cross author cannot archive publisher's version/PDFen_AU
dc.publisherUniversity of Toronto Press
dc.sourceCanadian Historical Review
dc.titleDetermining the Punishment of Sex Criminals in Confederation Era Canada: A Matter of National Policy
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationStrange, Carolyn, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidStrange, Carolyn, u4156737en_AU
local.description.embargo2039-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor220204 - History and Philosophy of Law and Justiceen_AU
local.identifier.absseo970121 - Expanding Knowledge in History and Archaeologyen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu1007931xPUB169en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume99en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.3138/chr.2017-0122en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85058009578
local.identifier.thomsonIDWOS:000451320200001
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Strange_Determining_the_Punishment_of_2018.pdf
Size:
321.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format