Open Research will be updating the system on Tuesday, 14 July 2026, from 8:15 to 9:00 AM. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

What is the best use of oil from cotton (Gossypium spp.) and canola (Brassica spp.) for reducing net greenhouse gas emissions: biodiesel, or as a feed for cattle?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Ludemann, C.I.
Howden, Mark
Eckard, Richard John

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium spp.) and canola (Brassica spp.) are significant crops worldwide. Vegetable oil extracted from the seed of these crops offers the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) through conversion into biodiesel to displace GHG associated with fossil-fuel diesel, or, by feeding the oil to cattle to reduce enteric methane emissions. Estimations of the netGHGeffects of these two alternative uses of vegetable oil from cottonseed and canola were made in the present study for Australian conditions, using data from the literature and empirical data from livestock experiments. Results from the present study, which used aGHGaccounting approach, indicated that feeding canola oil (as canola meal with 10.4% oil concentration) to cattle resulted in a net increase in GHG. However,GHGabatement from biodiesel produced from the oil (associated with the production of this same canola meal) exceeded the net increase inGHGfrom feeding the canola meal byproduct to cattle. This means that there would be an overall GHG abatement from the combination of converting canola oil into biodiesel and feeding the resultant canola meal (with 10.4% oil concentration) to cattle. Feeding cottonseed oil in a supplement to cattle (whole cottonseed with 22% oil concentration) was estimated to result inGHGabatement, but to a lesser degree than would conversion into biodiesel. In both cases, major determinants of the GHG balance were the emissions arising from long-distance transport of the high-oil supplementary feeds fed to cattle, or of biodiesel to end-users.

Description

Citation

Source

Animal production science

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31

Downloads

File
Description
abcd