A Tale of Two Studies: Ethics, Bioterrorism, and the Censorship of Science

dc.contributor.authorSelgelid, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T22:44:48Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.date.updated2015-12-07T11:28:49Z
dc.description.abstractSome scientific research should not be published. The risks to national security and public health override the social benefits of disseminating scientific results openly. Unfortunately, scientists themselves are not in a position to know which studies to withhold from public view, as the National Research Council has proposed. Yet neither can government alone be trusted to balance the competing interests at stake.
dc.identifier.issn0093-0334
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/25355
dc.publisherHastings Center
dc.sourceThe Hastings Center Report
dc.subjectKeywords: access to information; article; biological warfare; ethics; government regulation; medical research; organization and management; publishing; United States; Access to Information; Biomedical Research; Bioterrorism; Government Regulation; Publishing; Secur
dc.titleA Tale of Two Studies: Ethics, Bioterrorism, and the Censorship of Science
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage43
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage35
local.contributor.affiliationSelgelid, Michael, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidSelgelid, Michael, u4331118
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor220200 - HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SPECIFIC FIELDS
local.identifier.absfor220100 - APPLIED ETHICS
local.identifier.absfor160500 - POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION
local.identifier.ariespublicationa240288xPUB38
local.identifier.citationvolume37
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-34250647457
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Selgelid_A_Tale_of_Two_Studies:_Ethics,_2007.pdf
Size:
787.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format