Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological constraints from cluster abundances and weak lensing

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Abbott, T. M. C
Aguena, M
Alarcon, A.
Allam, Sahar
Allen, S.
Annis, J
Avila, S.
Bacon, David
Bechtol, K
Bermeo-Hernandez, A.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Physical Society

Abstract

We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset. Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in surprisingly low values for S8 ¼ σ8ðΩm=0.3Þ0.5 ¼ 0.65 0.04, driven by a low matter density parameter, Ωm ¼ 0.179þ0.031 −0.038 , with σ8 − Ωm posteriors in 2.4σ tension with the DES Y1 3x2pt results, and in 5.6σ with the Planck CMB analysis. These results include the impact of post-unblinding changes to the analysis, which did not improve the level of consistency with other data sets compared to the results obtained at the unblinding. The fact that multiple cosmological probes (supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and CMB anisotropies), and other galaxy cluster analyses all favor significantly higher matter densities suggests the presence of systematic errors in the data or an incomplete modeling of the relevant physics. Cross checks with x-ray and microwave data, as well as independent constraints on the observable-mass relation from Sunyaev-Zeldovich selected clusters, suggest that the discrepancy resides in our modeling of the weak lensing signal rather than the cluster abundance. Repeating our analysis using a higher richness threshold (λ ≥ 30) significantly reduces the tension with other probes, and points to one or more richness-dependent effects not captured by our model.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Physical Review D

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads

abcd