Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Records, Reasons and Rationality in Judicial Control of Administrative Power: England, the US and Australia

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Cane, Peter

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Israel Law Review Association

Abstract

This article analyses, from historical and comparative perspectives, three closely related concepts of administrative law - namely records, reasons and rationality. It finds that the concept of the 'administrative record' is far more significant in United States administrative law than in either English or Australian administrative law, and suggests why this might be so. The importance of the record in US law explains why it imposes stronger obligations on administrators to give reasons than does either English or Australian law. It also explains why terms such as 'rationality' and 'reasonableness' have significantly different meanings in US administrative law on the one hand, and English and Australian law on the other.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Israel Law Review

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31
abcd