Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Comparison of dermal absorption of zinc from different sunscreen formulations and differing UV exposure based on stable isotope tracing

dc.contributor.authorGulson, Brian
dc.contributor.authorWong, Herbert
dc.contributor.authorKorsch, Michael
dc.contributor.authorGomez, Laura
dc.contributor.authorCasey, Philip
dc.contributor.authorMcCall, Maxine
dc.contributor.authorMcCulloch, Malcolm
dc.contributor.authorTrotter, Julie
dc.contributor.authorStauber, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorGreenoak, Gavin
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T23:00:24Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T09:27:31Z
dc.description.abstractIn a pilot study to determine if zinc (Zn) from zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreen can penetrate human skin in vivo, nanoparticles (~30nm) of a stable isotope (52% 68Zn enrichment) were incorporated into an essentially phytochemical-based formulation and applied to the backs of 3 human subjects twice daily for 5days during the Southern Hemisphere winter. Blood and urine were collected prior to application and at regular intervals and up to 50days. As observed in a larger outdoor trial following this pilot study but with a different formulation and with UV exposure: values of 68Zn in blood continued to increase beyond the 5day application phase with the highest measurement at 14days after the first application; variable amounts of the 68Zn tracer were observed in urine; and the amounts of extra Zn added to blood were small and indicate very low levels of absorption (minimal estimate <0.01% of the applied dose) through the skin. Reasons for differences in absorption detected in the stable isotope trials and previous investigations include: the sensitivity of the stable isotope method; the duration of the investigations; the number of applications of sunscreen formulation; in vitro methods with excised skin; lack of measurement of blood and urine; no skin flexing; and lack of UV exposure.
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/61334
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.sourceScience of the Total Environment
dc.subjectKeywords: Dermal absorption; Human; Human skin in vivo; Human subjects; In vivo; In-vitro; Low level; Pilot studies; Southern Hemisphere; Stable isotopes; Sunscreen; UV exposure; Zinc isotopes; Zinc oxide nanoparticles; Blood; Isotopes; Nanoparticles; Sun hoods; Zi Human; In vivo; Nanoparticles; Sunscreen; Zinc isotopes; Zinc oxide
dc.titleComparison of dermal absorption of zinc from different sunscreen formulations and differing UV exposure based on stable isotope tracing
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage318
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage313
local.contributor.affiliationGulson, Brian, Macquarie University
local.contributor.affiliationWong, Herbert, Macquarie University
local.contributor.affiliationKorsch, Michael, CSIRO
local.contributor.affiliationGomez, Laura, Macquarie University
local.contributor.affiliationCasey, Philip, CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering
local.contributor.affiliationMcCall, Maxine, CSIRO
local.contributor.affiliationMcCulloch, Malcolm, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationTrotter, Julie, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationStauber, Jenny, CSIRO Land and Water
local.contributor.affiliationGreenoak, Gavin, University of Sydney
local.contributor.authoruidMcCulloch, Malcolm, u7902024
local.contributor.authoruidTrotter, Julie, u4038360
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor040600 - PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE
local.identifier.ariespublicationf5625xPUB604
local.identifier.citationvolume420
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.046
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84857655726
local.identifier.thomsonID000301136600001
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Gulson_Comparison_of_dermal_2012.pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
abcd