Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Do cash incentives increase the uptake of chlamydia testing in pharmacies?

dc.contributor.authorMartin, S. J.
dc.contributor.authorCurrie, M. J.
dc.contributor.authorDeeks, L. S.
dc.contributor.authorCooper, G. M.
dc.contributor.authorParker, R. M.
dc.contributor.authorDel Rosario, R.
dc.contributor.authorHocking, J. S.
dc.contributor.authorBowden, Francis
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-01T00:53:47Z
dc.date.available2016-04-01T00:53:47Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.updated2016-06-14T08:38:54Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Chlamydia screening uptake rates in Australian and overseas pharmacies vary widely (11% to 58%). AIM: To determine the effect on the uptake of chlamydia screening in community pharmacies when a cash reward is offered to young people and participating pharmacies. METHODS: The study was advertised in print and electronic media. People aged 16–30 years requested, or were offered, chlamydia testing kits by pharmacy staff (assistants and pharmacists). Participants who provided a urine sample and completed a questionnaire received AUD$10; pharmacies received AUD$10 per person recruited. Urine specimens were tested in pools using PCR, with reflex testing of individual samples when the pool tested positive. Positive cases were notified by sexual health nurses and offered treatment. RESULTS: Six urban community pharmacies took part in the study, each for 15 days. 979 testing kits were given out and 970 sample pots returned (99.1%); 66 (7%) did not contain urine. 74% (670/904) of the urine samples were determined to be from unique individuals, 65% of whom were male. 19 people (13 females and 6 males) tested positive; positivity rates were 5.2% (95% CI 2.8 to 8.8) for females and 1.4% for males. 11 (61%) of those testing positive were contacted and eight attended a local sexual health centre for treatment, three were treated elsewhere. Of the eight people treated at the sexual health centre, two females aged 15 and 20 years were diagnosed with pelvic inflammatory disease. Contact with the remaining eight positive individuals was not possible due to disconnected, incorrect or non-existent telephone numbers. CONCLUSION: The 68% specimen return rate found in this study significantly exceeds those reported elsewhere. Strategies to prevent repeat testing, non-urine specimens and incorrect contact numbers are needed to ensure good clinical care and optimum use of resources.
dc.identifier.issn1368-4973en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/100933
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.rights© BMJ Publishing Group
dc.sourceSexually Transmitted Infections
dc.titleDo cash incentives increase the uptake of chlamydia testing in pharmacies?
dc.typeConference poster
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issueSuppl 1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpageA35en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpageA35en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMartin, Sarah, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE ANU Medical School, ANU Medical School, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCurrie, Marian, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE ANU Medical School, ANU Medical School, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDeeks, Louise, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE ANU Medical School, ANU Medical School, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCooper, Gabrielle, University of Canberra, Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationParker, Rhian, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE Research School of Population Health, Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDel Rosario, Rendry, ACT Health, Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHocking, Jane S, University of Melbourne, Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBowden, Francis, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE ANU Medical School, ANU Medical School, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidu5095726en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor111717en_AU
local.identifier.absseo920499en_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu3342134xPUB8en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume88en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1136/sextrans-2012-050601c.75en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.bmj.com/company/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
martin_do_cash_incentives.pdf
Size:
58.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: