Geophysical Prospection for Late Holocene Burials in Coastal Environments: Possibilities and Problems from a Pilot Study in South Australia

dc.contributor.authorMoffat, Ian
dc.contributor.authorWallis, Lynley A.
dc.contributor.authorHounslow, Mark W.
dc.contributor.authorNiland, Katrina
dc.contributor.authorDomett, Kathryn M
dc.contributor.authorTrevorrow, George
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:30:56Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.updated2015-12-09T10:06:25Z
dc.description.abstractGeophysical techniques have been widely employed for the noninvasive location of burial sites in archaeological and forensic investigations. This approach has met with varying degrees of success, depending on factors such as equipment choice, survey methodology, burial type, and geological setting. This paper reports the results of a multitechnique geophysical survey carried out immediately prior to the salvage excavation of two Indigenous burials from an eolian dune in coastal South Australia. Ground-penetrating radar was not successful in defining the location of the burials owing to the disturbed nature of the local stratigraphy. Magnetic field intensity and apparent magnetic susceptibility surveys identified discrete anomalies that coincided with the location of skeletal material revealed during excavation, which we hypothesize to be due to burning or ochre use during funerary practices. Despite the spatial association of these features, subsequent laboratory analyses of the mineralogy and magnetic properties of sediments collected from the site failed to find a definite cause of the anomalies. Nevertheless, the association between them and the primary interment locations has implications for archaeological surveys carried out in the Australian coastal zone, as it highlights the potential of magnetic field intensity and apparent magnetic susceptibility geophysical techniques undertaken with a more refined survey methodology to afford a noninvasive, culturally appropriate means through which to detect Indigenous burials. This approach may prove particularly useful in areas with disturbed stratigraphy where ground-penetrating radar is less effective.
dc.identifier.issn0883-6353
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/55309
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Inc
dc.sourceGeoarchaeology: An International Journal
dc.titleGeophysical Prospection for Late Holocene Burials in Coastal Environments: Possibilities and Problems from a Pilot Study in South Australia
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue5
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage665
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage645
local.contributor.affiliationMoffat, Ian, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationWallis, Lynley A., Flinders University
local.contributor.affiliationHounslow, Mark W., Lancaster University
local.contributor.affiliationNiland, Katrina, Flinders University
local.contributor.affiliationDomett, Kathryn M, James Cook University
local.contributor.affiliationTrevorrow, George, Coorong Wilderness Lodge
local.contributor.authoruidMoffat, Ian, u4432249
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor210102 - Archaeological Science
local.identifier.absseo950302 - Conserving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage
local.identifier.ariespublicationf2965xPUB325
local.identifier.citationvolume25
local.identifier.doi10.1002/gea.20321
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-77957363344
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Moffat_Geophysical_Prospection_for_2010.pdf
Size:
409.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format