The Ottawa ankle rules for the use of diagnostic X-ray in after hours medical centres in New Zealand
Date
2002-09-27
Authors
Wynn-Thomas, Simon
Love, Tom
McLeod, Deborah
Vernall, Sue
Kljakovic, Marjan
Dowell, Anthony
Durham, John
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
New Zealand Medical Association
Abstract
Aims: The aims of this study were to measure baseline use of Ottawa ankle rules
(OAR), validate the OAR and, if appropriate, explore the impact of implementing the
Rules on X-ray rates in a primary care, after hours medical centre setting.
Methods: General practitioners (GPs) were surveyed to find their awareness of ankle
injury guidelines. Data concerning diagnosis and X-ray utilisation were collected
prospectively for patients presenting with ankle injuries to two after hours medical
centres. The OAR were applied retrospectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of
the OAR were compared with GPs’ clinical judgement in ordering X-rays. The
outcome measures were X-ray utilisation and diagnosis of fracture. Results: Awareness of the OAR was low. The sensitivity of the OAR for diagnosis of fractures was 100% (95% CI: 75.3 – 100) and the specificity was 47% (95% CI: 40.5 – 54.5). The sensitivity of GPs’ clinical judgement was 100% (95% CI: 75.3 – 100)
and the specificity was 37% (95% CI: 30.2 – 44.2). Implementing the OAR would
reduce X-ray utilisation by 16% (95% CI: approx 10.8 – 21.3). Conclusions: The OAR are valid in a New Zealand primary care setting. Further implementation of the rules would result in some reduction of X-rays ordered for ankle injuries, but less than the reduction found in previous studies.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
New Zealand Medical Journal 115.1162 (2002): 1-7
Type
Journal article
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description