Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Valuing Australian botanic collections: A combined travel-cost and contingent valuation study

dc.contributor.authorMwebaze, Paul
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Jeffrey
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T23:30:33Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T08:49:26Z
dc.description.abstractEconomic values of biological collections in three Australian botanic gardens in Canberra, Melbourne and Sydney were estimated using the travel-cost method (TCM) and the contingent valuation method (CVM). The TCM component of the study produced average per-trip consumer surplus (CS) values of $39 and $18 for single- and multiple-site visitors, respectively, for each botanic garden, resulting in an estimate of approximately $194 million for the total social welfare generated by trips to the three sites. Marginal willingness to pay (WTP) for access to botanic gardens was also investigated through payment vehicles of entry fees or higher parking charges using the CVM component. The analysis revealed a positive mean WTP of between $3 and $5 per trip per person. The difference between the CVM and TCM results reflect the different underlying concepts of value under investigation: average CS per visit for the TCM and the utility arising from a marginal visit for the CVM. Marginal changes in CS from the TCM were derived. The confidence intervals from the TCM marginal values overlap the WTP estimates from the CVM. These findings will be useful for resource management decisions in the botanic gardens collection in Australia.
dc.identifier.issn1364-985X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/68243
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.sourceAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
dc.subjectKeywords: contingent valuation; decision making; environmental economics; garden; resource management; welfare economics; willingness to pay; Australia; Australian Capital Territory; Canberra; Melbourne; New South Wales; Sydney [New South Wales]; Victoria [Australi Biological collections; Botanic gardens; Contingent valuation method; Economic value; Travel-cost method; Willingness to pay
dc.titleValuing Australian botanic collections: A combined travel-cost and contingent valuation study
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage520
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage498
local.contributor.affiliationMwebaze, Paul, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationBennett, Jeffrey, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidMwebaze, Paul, u4820320
local.contributor.authoruidBennett, Jeffrey, u9907243
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor140205 - Environment and Resource Economics
local.identifier.ariespublicationf5625xPUB1656
local.identifier.citationvolume56
local.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00595.x
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84866267983
local.identifier.thomsonID000308710200003
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Mwebaze_Valuing_Australian_botanic_2012.pdf
Size:
438.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format