Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Urban area disadvantage and physical activity: a multilevel study in Melbourne, Australia

dc.contributor.authorKavanagh, Anne M
dc.contributor.authorGoller, Jane
dc.contributor.authorKing, Tania
dc.contributor.authorJolley, Damien
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, David
dc.contributor.authorTurrell, Gavin
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-14T23:19:22Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.updated2016-06-14T08:38:30Z
dc.description.abstractObjective: To estimate variation between small areas in the levels of walking, cycling, jogging, and swimming and overall physical activity and the importance of area level socioeconomic disadvantage in predicting physical activity participation. Methods: All census collector districts (CCDs) in the 20 innermost local government areas in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia, were identified and ranked by the percentage of low income households (,$400/ week) living in the CCD. Fifty CCDs were randomly selected from the least, middle, and most disadvantaged septiles of the ranked CCDs and 2349 residents (58.7% participation rate) participated in a cross sectional postal survey about physical activity. Multilevel logistic regression (adjusted for extrabinomial variation) was used to estimate area level variation in walking, cycling, jogging, and swimming and in overall physical activity participation, and the importance of area level socioeconomic disadvantage in predicting physical activity participation. Results: There were significant variations between CCDs in all activities and in overall physical participation in age and sex adjusted models; however, after adjustment for individual SES (income, occupation, education) and area level socioeconomic disadvantage, significant differences remained only for walking (p = 0.004), cycling (p = 0.003), and swimming (p = 0.024). Living in the most socioeconomically disadvantaged areas was associated with a decreased likelihood of jogging and of having overall physical activity levels that were sufficiently active for health; these effects remained after adjustment for individual socioeconomic status (sufficiently active: OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.90 and jogging: OR= 0.69, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.94). Conclusion: These research findings support the need to focus on improving local environments to increase physical activity participation.
dc.identifier.issn1470-2738
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/102859
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group Ltd
dc.sourceJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health
dc.subjectKeywords: activity coefficient; health and disease; adult; article; Australia; cycling; female; human; jogging; logistic regression analysis; lowest income group; major clinical study; male; physical activity; socioeconomics; swimming; urban area; urban population;
dc.titleUrban area disadvantage and physical activity: a multilevel study in Melbourne, Australia
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage940
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage934
local.contributor.affiliationKavanagh, Anne M, University of Melbourne
local.contributor.affiliationGoller, Jane, University of Melbourne
local.contributor.affiliationKing, Tania, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationJolley, Damien, Monash Medical Centre
local.contributor.affiliationCrawford, David, Deakin University
local.contributor.affiliationTurrell, Gavin, Queensland University of Technology
local.contributor.authoruidKing, Tania, u1021536
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor111706 - Epidemiology
local.identifier.absfor111716 - Preventive Medicine
local.identifier.ariespublicationu1021536xPUB5
local.identifier.citationvolume59
local.identifier.doi10.1136/jech.2005.035931
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-27344436495
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Kavanagh_Urban_area_disadvantage_and_2005.pdf
Size:
81.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format