Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Heterophile interference accounts for method-specific dsDNA antibodies in patients receiving anti-TNF treatment

dc.contributor.authorAlshekaili, Jalila
dc.contributor.authorLi, Candice
dc.contributor.authorCook, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:14:09Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T10:41:28Z
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate analytical explanations for the highly reported incidence of antibodies to dsDNA in patients receiving TNF antagonists. Sixty serum samples from patients receiving biological anti-TNF medication were assessed for the presence of dsDNA antibodies using three standard diagnostic platforms [ELISA, IIF and multiplex bead array (MBA)], before and after treatment to block heterophile antibodies. Results were compared with those obtained using serum samples from patients with SLE. We identified significant method-specific discrepancies in the estimation of dsDNA antibodies in patients receiving TNF antagonists. dsDNA antibodies were frequent according to ELISA and IIF, but rare according to MBA. Blockade of heterophile antibodies resulted in a significant reduction in titres of dsDNA antibodies detected by IIF. In contrast, there was a much greater consistency for dsDNA antibody results in SLE, especially for those present in high titre, and blockade of heterophile antibodies did not result in a change between the two paired samples by IIF or MBA. There is a significant method-specific variation in the detection of dsDNA antibodies in patients receiving TNF antagonists, due in part to the effects of heterophile antibodies.
dc.identifier.issn1462-0324
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/50139
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.sourceRheumatology
dc.subjectKeywords: antinuclear antibody; DNA; heterophile antibody; immunologic factor; tumor necrosis factor alpha; adult; aged; article; drug antagonism; enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; female; fluorescent antibody technique; human; immunology; male; methodology; middl
dc.titleHeterophile interference accounts for method-specific dsDNA antibodies in patients receiving anti-TNF treatment
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue5
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage897
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage891
local.contributor.affiliationAlshekaili, Jalila, The Canberra Hospital
local.contributor.affiliationLi, Candice, The Canberra Hospital
local.contributor.affiliationCook, Matthew, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidCook, Matthew, u2572788
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor111799 - Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4201517xPUB198
local.identifier.citationvolume49
local.identifier.doi10.1093/rheumatology/keq018
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-77956185169
local.identifier.thomsonID000276736400009
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Alshekaili_Heterophile_interference_2010.pdf
Size:
178.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format