Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Cities are hotspots for threatened species

dc.contributor.authorIves, Christopher D.
dc.contributor.authorLentini, Pia E.
dc.contributor.authorThrelfall, Caragh
dc.contributor.authorStagoll (Ikin), Karen
dc.contributor.authorShanahan, Danielle
dc.contributor.authorGarrard, Georgia
dc.contributor.authorBekessy, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorFuller, Richard A.
dc.contributor.authorMumaw, Laura
dc.contributor.authorRayner, Laura
dc.contributor.authorRowe, Robert (Ross)
dc.contributor.authorValentine, Leonie
dc.contributor.authorKendal, Dave
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-14T23:20:47Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.updated2016-06-14T08:53:19Z
dc.description.abstractAim Although urbanization impacts many species, there is little information on the patterns of occurrences of threatened species in urban relative to non-urban areas. By assessing the extent of the distribution of threatened species across all Australian cities, we aim to investigate the currently under-utilized opportunity that cities present for national biodiversity conservation. Location Australian mainland, Tasmania and offshore islands. Methods Distributions of Australia’s 1643 legally protected terrestrial species (hereafter ‘threatened species’) were compiled. We assessed the extent to which they overlapped with 99 cities (of more than 10,000 people), with all non-urban areas, and with simulated ‘dummy’ cities which covered the same area and bioregion as the true cities but were non-urban. We analysed differences between animals and plants, and examined variability within these groups using species accumulation modelling. Threatened species richness of true versus dummy cities was analysed using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Results Australian cities support substantially more nationally threatened animal and plant species than all other non-urban areas on a unit-area basis. Thirty per cent of threatened species were found to occur in cities. Distribution patterns differed between plants and animals: individual threatened plant species were generally found in fewer cities than threatened animal species, yet plants were more likely to have a greater proportion of their distribution in urban areas than animals. Individual cities tended to contain unique suites of threatened species, especially threatened plants. The analysis of true versus dummy cities demonstrated that, even after accounting for factors such as net primary productivity and distance to the coast, cities still consistently supported a greater number of threatened species. Main conclusions This research highlights that Australian cities are important for the conservation of threatened species, and that the species assemblages of individual cities are relatively distinct. National conservation policy should recognize that cities play an integral role when planning for and managing threatened species.
dc.identifier.issn1466-822X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/103554
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.sourceGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
dc.titleCities are hotspots for threatened species
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage126
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage117
local.contributor.affiliationIves, Christopher D., RMIT University
local.contributor.affiliationLentini, Pia E., The University of Melbourne
local.contributor.affiliationThrelfall, Caragh, University of Melbourne
local.contributor.affiliationStagoll (Ikin), Karen, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationShanahan, Danielle, University of Queensland
local.contributor.affiliationGarrard, Georgia, RMIT University
local.contributor.affiliationBekessy, Sarah, RMIT University
local.contributor.affiliationFuller, Richard A., University of Queensland
local.contributor.affiliationMumaw, Laura, RMIT University
local.contributor.affiliationRayner, Laura, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationRowe, Robert (Ross), College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationValentine, Leonie, The University of Western Australia
local.contributor.affiliationKendal, Dave, Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology
local.contributor.authoruidStagoll (Ikin), Karen, u3207786
local.contributor.authoruidRayner, Laura, u4819975
local.contributor.authoruidRowe, Robert (Ross), u3415332
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor050202 - Conservation and Biodiversity
local.identifier.absseo960805 - Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity at Regional or Larger Scales
local.identifier.ariespublicationU3488905xPUB8369
local.identifier.citationvolume25
local.identifier.doi10.1111/geb.12404
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84954454063
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Ives_Cities_are_hotspots_for_2016.pdf
Size:
650.45 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format