Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Is the switch from I- to S-type magmatism in the Himalayan Orogen indicative of the collision of India and Eurasia?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

White, Lloyd
Ahmad, Talat
Lister, Gordon
Forster, Margaret
Ireland, Trevor

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Abstract

The switch from I- to S-type magmatism in the Trans-Himalayan Batholith is one of the criteria used to determine when India and Eurasia collided. We present new 238U/ 206Pb SHRIMP data from the Karakorum Batholith, NW India. Our results suggest that an I-type hornblende-biotite granodiorite was emplaced at 31.4 ± 0.4 Ma and crosscut by S-type granite dykes at 18.0 ± 0.4 Ma. We interpret these data to indicate that volatile-fluxed melting of a mantle wedge above an active subduction zone and/or decompression melting of sub-arc asthenosphere was possible until at least 31 Ma. This interpretation uses the same rationale as previous workers have adopted to propose that the India-Eurasia collision occurred between 57 Ma and 47 Ma. A review of published data provides further evidence of &50 Ma magmatism and Cu-Au-Mo porphyry deposit mineralisation north of the Himalayan range. These rocks would be interpreted to have formed in an arc setting in other parts of the world. However, most workers consider that &50 Ma magmatism and porphyry deposit formation in the Himalaya is unrelated to subduction of oceanic lithosphere and are instead considered to form owing to 'post-collisional' processes. We argue that these interpretations have been based on an established model where the India-Eurasia collision is deemed to occur at ca 50 Ma, instead of using the data to question and refine existing tectonic models.

Description

Citation

Source

Australian Journal of Earth Sciences

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31