Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Efficacy of anthelminthic drugs and drug combinations against soil-transmitted helminths: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorClarke, Naomi
dc.contributor.authorDoi, Suhail
dc.contributor.authorWangdi, Kinley
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yingxi
dc.contributor.authorClements, Archie
dc.contributor.authorVaz Nery, Susana
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-02T06:53:42Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.updated2019-03-31T07:24:25Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Periodic mass distribution of benzimidazole anthelminthic drugs is the key strategy to control soil-transmitted helminths (STH) globally. However, benzimidazoles have low efficacy against Trichuris trichiura, and there are concerns about benzimidazole resistance potentially emerging in humans. Therefore, identifying alternative drug regimens is a pressing priority. We present a systematic review and network meta-analysis, comparing the efficacy of 21 different anthelminthic drug regimens, including standard, novel, and combination treatments. Methods: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases and identified studies comparing anthelminthic treatments to each other or placebo. The outcomes calculated were relative risk (RR) of cure and difference in egg reduction rates (dERR). We used an automated generalized pair-wise modelling framework to generate mixed treatment effects against a common comparator, the current standard treatment (single-dose albendazole). This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016050739). Findings: Our search identified 4876 studies, of which 114 were included in meta-analysis. Results identified several drug combinations with higher efficacy than single-dose albendazole for T. trichiura, including albendazole-ivermectin (RR of cure 3.22, 95%CI 1.84–5.63; dERR 0.97, 95%CI 0.21–1.74), albendazole-oxantel pamoate (RR 5.07, 95%CI 1.65–15.59; dERR 0.51, 95%CI 0.450–0.52), mebendazole-ivermectin (RR 3.37, 95%CI 2.20–5.16), and tribendimidine-oxantel pamoate (RR 4.06, 95%CI 1.30–12.64). Interpretation: There are several promising drug combinations that may enhance the impact of STH control programs on T. trichiura, without compromising efficacy against A. lumbricoides and hookworm. We suggest further, large-scale trials of these drug combinations and consideration of their use in STH control programs where T. trichiura is present.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipN. E. C. is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Y. C. is supported by an Endeavour Postgraduate Scholarship. A. C. A. C. is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Senior Research Fellowshipen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1058-4838en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/164897
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicago Pressen_AU
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of Americaen_AU
dc.sourceClinical Infectious Diseasesen_AU
dc.titleEfficacy of anthelminthic drugs and drug combinations against soil-transmitted helminths: a systematic review and network meta-analysisen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage105en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage96en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationClarke, Naomi, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDoi, Suhail, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWangdi, Kinley, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationChen, Yingxi, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationClements, Archie, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationVaz Nery, Susana, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidClarke, Naomi, u5751452en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidDoi, Suhail, u1005204en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidWangdi, Kinley, u5608272en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidChen, Yingxi, u4983108en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidClements, Archie, u5611518en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidVaz Nery, Susana, u5633425en_AU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor111706 - Epidemiologyen_AU
local.identifier.absfor111700 - PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH SERVICESen_AU
local.identifier.absseo920109 - Infectious Diseasesen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu5684624xPUB260en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume68en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1093/cid/ciy423en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85056431435
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.oxfordjournals.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Clarke_Efficacy_of_anthelminthic_2019.pdf
Size:
4.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format