Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Root traits explain plant species distributions along climatic gradients yet challenge the nature of ecological trade-offs

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Laughlin, Daniel C.
Mommer, Liesje
Sabatini, Francesco Maria
Bruelheide, Helge
Kuyper, Thom W.
McCormack, M. Luke
Bergmann, Joana
Freschet, Gregoire T.
Guerrero-Ramirez, Nathaly R.
Iversen, Colleen M

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group

Abstract

Ecological theory is built on trade-offs, where trait differences among species evolved as adaptations to different environments. Trade-offs are often assumed to be bidirectional, where opposite ends of a gradient in trait values confer advantages in different environments. However, unidirectional benefits could be widespread if extreme trait values confer advantages at one end of an environmental gradient, whereas a wide range of trait values are equally beneficial at the other end. Here, we show that root traits explain species occurrences along broad gradients of temperature and water availability, but model predictions only resembled trade-offs in two out of 24 models. Forest species with low specific root length and high root tissue density (RTD) were more likely to occur in warm climates but species with high specific root length and low RTD were more likely to occur in cold climates. Unidirectional benefits were more prevalent than trade-offs: for example, species with large-diameter roots and high RTD were more commonly associated with dry climates, but species with the opposite trait values were not associated with wet climates. Directional selection for traits consistently occurred in cold or dry climates, whereas a diversity of root trait values were equally viable in warm or wet climates. Explicit integration of unidirectional benefits into ecological theory is needed to advance our understanding of the consequences of trait variation on species responses to environmental change.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Nature Ecology & Evolution

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31

Downloads

abcd