Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Improving the Accuracy of PCM-UAHF and PCM-UAKS Calculations Using Optimized Electrostatic Scaling Factors

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Xu, Longkun
Coote, Michelle

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Chemical Society

Abstract

The optimal electrostatic scaling factor (ESF) for the calculation of solvation Gibbs free energies with the polarizable continuum model (PCM) was determined via extensive benchmarking against 1719 experimental solvation Gibbs free energies and transfer free energies taken from the MNSol-v2012 database, as well as 45 aqueous pKa values covering nine solute types (amines, thiols, carbon acid cations, pyridines, alcohols, anilines, carboxylic acids, carbon acid neutrals, phenols) and 20 pKa values in acetonitrile covering four solute types (phenols, carbon acids, carboxylic acids, pyridines). Optimal values for the ESF in a range of solvents are reported. For example, in water, the optimal ESF value is 1.2 and this does not vary with solute charge, radius type, or method. For acetonitrile, we recommend 1.1 for neutrals, 1.0 and 1.1 respectively for cations with UAHF and UAKS radii types, 1.3 for anions for IEFPCM-UAHF, and 1.4 for other anions. At the same time, we show that ESF optimization does not address all errors in PCM, and is thus not a substitute for the appropriate use of explicit solvent molecules, nor for the use of isodesmic methods to enhance systematic error cancellation. For a representative subset of the data we show that the errors in PCM are somewhat larger than in SMD and somewhat smaller than in COSMO-RS, although the latter has not benefited from cavity scaling.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Journal of chemical theory and computation

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until