Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Sensitivity of chickpea and faba bean to root-zone hypoxia, elevated ethylene, and carbon dioxide

dc.contributor.authorMunir, Rushna
dc.contributor.authorKonnerup, Dennis
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Hammad
dc.contributor.authorSiddique, Kadambot H. M.
dc.contributor.authorColmer, Timothy D.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-03T05:07:41Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-27
dc.date.updated2019-04-21T08:26:19Z
dc.description.abstractDuring soil waterlogging, plants experience O2 deficits, elevated ethylene, and high CO2 in the root‐zone. The effects on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) of ethylene (2 μL L−1), CO2 (2–20% v/v) or deoxygenated stagnant solution were evaluated. Ethylene and high CO2 reduced root growth of both species, but O2 deficiency had the most damaging effect and especially so for chickpea. Chickpea suffered root tip death when in deoxygenated stagnant solution. High CO2 inhibited root respiration and reduced growth, whereas sugars accumulated in root tips, of both species. Gas‐filled porosity of the basal portion of the primary root of faba bean (23%, v/v) was greater than for chickpea (10%), and internal O2 movement was more prominent in faba bean when in an O2‐free medium. Ethylene treatment increased the porosity of roots. The damaging effects of low O2, such as death of root tips, resulted in poor recovery of root growth upon reaeration. In conclusion, ethylene and high CO2 partially inhibited root extension in both species, but low O2 in deoxygenated stagnant solution had the most damaging effect, even causing death of root tips in chickpea, which was more sensitive to the low O2 condition than faba bean.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the School of Plant Biology and the UWA Institute of Agriculture at The University of Western Australia.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0140-7791en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/173100
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_AU
dc.rights© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltden_AU
dc.sourcePlant Cell and Environmenten_AU
dc.titleSensitivity of chickpea and faba bean to root-zone hypoxia, elevated ethylene, and carbon dioxideen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage97en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage85en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMunir, Rushna, The University of Western Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKonnerup, Dennis, University of Western Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKhan, Hammad, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSiddique, Kadambot H. M. , The University of Western Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationColmer, Timothy D., University of Western Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidKhan, Hammad, u1038898en_AU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor060705 - Plant Physiologyen_AU
local.identifier.absseo970106 - Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciencesen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu3102795xPUB548en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume42en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1111/pce.13173en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85058865390
local.publisher.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.comen_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Munir_Sensitivity_of_chickpea_and_2019.pdf
Size:
745.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format