Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Integrated shrub management in semi-arid woodlands of eastern Australia: ground and aerial application of defoliant to shrubs regenerating after disturbance

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Noble, J C
Muller, W J
MacLeod, N D
Bodulovic, Z
Jones, Peter G
Wood, Jeffrey

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Australian Rangeland Society

Abstract

This paper describes experiments undertaken at several sites in semi-arid woodlands of eastern Australia to determine if chemicals applied either on the ground or from the air reduce the density of shrubs regenerating after disturbance. Ground-spraying of Roundup® in the autumn was more effective than spring application in defoliating shrubs, especially 2-year-old coppice growth. Spraying of Roundup with a hand-held boom at 0.5 up to 2.5 kg glyphosate/ha identified rates to be used for boom spraying. Aerial spraying experiments were then undertaken across several sites and involved several target species. The location of sufficiently large areas where shrub regeneration was of an optimum age (i.e. about 2-3 years) proved to be extremely difficult due to prevailing drought conditions precluding the use of prescribed fire as a preliminary treatment. Nonetheless in one experiment, young (1-year-old) regrowth of firebush (Senna pleurocarpa) exhibited increased sensitivity to Roundup with significant shoot mortality recorded after it had been applied at 0.5kg glyphosate/ha. Aerial spraying based on an ultra-low volume application of 10L/ha further enhanced cost-effectiveness on this occasion. Economic analyses structured around 20-year partial budgeting and determination of net present value (NPV) suggested a profitable return could be expected where treatment was based on Roundup applied at this threshold rate 2 years after a prescribed fire, especially when the rehabilitation costs were spread over an entire paddock that had been only partially sprayed. Finally, operational aspects involving aerial spraying in these semi-arid woodlands are also discussed.

Description

Citation

Source

The Rangeland Journal

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until