Ant community responses to farmland use and revegetation in a fragmented agricultural landscape

dc.contributor.authorNg, Katherina
dc.contributor.authorNowrouzi, Somayeh
dc.contributor.authorStaunton, Kyran M.
dc.contributor.authorBarton, Philip
dc.contributor.authorDriscoll, D A
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T03:08:08Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2021-11-28T07:24:21Z
dc.description.abstractRecent alarming losses of insects from agricultural landscapes in multiple countries around the world have brought into sharp focus the urgent need to identify ways to manage these landscapes to avoid further biodiversity decline. Identifying the drivers of insect declines, such as land use change, is critical to this effort. We examined ant communities at the interface between remnant vegetation patches and three adjoining farmland types (wheat crop, rested from cropping and restoration plantings) in a fragmented landscape in temperate Australia. We asked: do ant communities and occurrence of individual species differ between remnant patches and farmlands with more intensive farmland use (restoration plantings < rested farmlands < wheat crop)? We recorded 13,283 ants belonging to 102 species from 30 genera. Excluding 21 singletons, 27 species only occurred in remnant patches compared to ten species found only in farmlands. Ant community composition in wheat crop and rested farmlands significantly differed from their adjacent remnant patches and were more homogeneous. In contrast, ant communities from restoration plantings in farmland were not significantly different in composition from those in the adjacent remnant patch. The large, aggressive Australian meat ant (Iridomyrmex purpureus) showed significantly higher occurrence in the remnant patch than all farmland types, and we suggest that the absence of this strongly interacting species from farmlands may have contributed to biotic homogenisation. Our findings show that native vegetation provides crucial habitat resources for many ant species that are not provided by farmlands, and native plantings can, in some cases, ameliorate negative effects of farmland clearing over relatively short time scales (<7 years). Agricultural intensification that involves loss of remnant native vegetation or reduced revegetation will contribute to ongoing losses and changes to ant biodiversity in farming landscapes. However, replanting native vegetation can lead to rapid restoration, signifying a possible simple remedy to insect declines.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Central Tablelands Local Land Services, Lake Cowal Foundation and Australian Government Research Training Program funding. Thanks to landholders (Day, Foy, Conlan, Hall, Lucas, Nowlan, Aylott, Grimm, Robinson, Crawford, Daley families) for prop- erty accessen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0167-8809en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/275680
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.rights© 2021 Elsevier B.V.en_AU
dc.sourceAgriculture Ecosystems and Environmenten_AU
dc.subjectAnt diversityen_AU
dc.subjectBiodiversity conservationen_AU
dc.subjectFallowen_AU
dc.subjectMatrixen_AU
dc.subjectMonitoringen_AU
dc.titleAnt community responses to farmland use and revegetation in a fragmented agricultural landscapeen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage8en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationNg, Katherina, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationNowrouzi, Somayeh, James Cook Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationStaunton, Kyran M., James Cook Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBarton, Philip, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDriscoll, D A, Deakin Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidNg, Katherina, u4009155en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidBarton, Philip, u4437087en_AU
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor000000 - Internal ANU use onlyen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB17638en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume311en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.agee.2021.107316en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85100181710
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.elsevier.com/en-auen_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0167880921000207-main.pdf
Size:
1.9 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: