Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Modern slavery disclosures in mining: a comparison of large UK and Australian companies

dc.contributor.authorChrist, Katherine L.
dc.contributor.authorBurritt, Roger
dc.contributor.authorPrider, Heather
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-05T04:30:42Z
dc.date.available2024-09-05T04:30:42Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2024-04-21T08:16:04Z
dc.description.abstractWith growing interest in eradication of modern slavery in operations and supply chains the purpose of the paper is to explore disclosures of the top ten listed mining companies in the UK and Australia. Institutional theory provides the foundation for a first examination of comparative modern slavery disclosures in these two countries, at the time one with and one without disclosure legislation. Based on qualitative thematic analysis, major results indicate the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 to be a catalyst for disclosures made by the sample of UK mining companies, whereas in Australia where no modern slavery legislation was in place, normative and mimetic institutional pressure is not viewed as important and the companies seemed underprepared for impending legislative changes. The paper concludes that transparency based legislation on modern slavery can provide a powerful coercive influence for change, strengthening other forms of normative and mimetic pressure.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2652-2896
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733716160
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
dc.publisherBESS
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2022 Dr Katherine L. Christ, Prof Roger L. Burritt, Heather Prider
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.sourceJournal of Behavioural Economics and Social Systems
dc.subjectModern slavery
dc.subjectMining
dc.titleModern slavery disclosures in mining: a comparison of large UK and Australian companies
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage40
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage23
local.contributor.affiliationChrist, Katherine L., University of South Australia
local.contributor.affiliationBurritt, Roger, College of Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationPrider, Heather, Chartered Accountant
local.contributor.authoruidBurritt, Roger, u8901504
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor350107 - Sustainability accounting and reporting
local.identifier.absseo280106 - Expanding knowledge in commerce, management, tourism and services
local.identifier.ariespublicationu1055894xPUB681
local.identifier.citationvolume4
local.identifier.doi10.54337/ojs.bess.v4i2.7747
local.publisher.urlhttps://journals.aau.dk/index.php/BESS/article/view/7747
local.type.statusPublished Version
publicationvolume.volumeNumber4

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Burritt_et_al_BESS2022_v4_n2.pdf
Size:
553.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
abcd