Reptiles and frogs use most land cover types as habitat in a fine-grained agricultural landscape

dc.contributor.authorPulsford, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorBarton, Philip
dc.contributor.authorDriscoll, D.A.
dc.contributor.authorKay, Geoffrey
dc.contributor.authorLindenmayer, David B
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-14T04:42:55Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.updated2019-11-25T07:20:15Z
dc.description.abstractAgricultural landscapes comprise much of the earth's terrestrial surface. However, knowledge about how animals use and move through these landscapes is limited, especially for small and cryptic taxa, such as reptiles and amphibians. We aimed to understand the influence of land use on reptile and frog movement in a fine‐grained grazing landscape. We surveyed reptiles and frogs using pitfall and funnel traps in transects located in five land use types: 1) woodland remnants, 2) grazed pastures, 3) coarse woody debris added to grazed pastures, 4) fences in grazed pastures and 5) linear plantings within grazed pastures. We found that the different land cover types influenced the types and distances moved by different species and groups of species. Reptiles moved both within, and out of, grazed paddocks more than they did in woodland remnants. In contrast, frogs exhibited varying movement behaviours. The smooth toadlet (Uperoleia laevigata) moved more often and longer distances within remnants than within paddocks. The spotted marsh frog (Limnodynastes tasmaniensis) moved out of grazed pastures more than out of pastures with coarse woody debris added or fences and were never recaptured in plantings. We found that most recaptured reptiles and frogs (76.3%) did not move between trapping arrays, which added to evidence that they perceived most of the land cover types as habitat. We suggest that even simple fences may provide conduits for movement in the agricultural landscape for frogs. Otherwise, most reptile and frog species used all land cover types as habitat, though of varying quality. Reptiles appeared to perceive the woodland remnants as the highest quality habitat. This landscape is fine‐grained which may facilitate movement and persistence due to high heterogeneity in vegetation cover over short distances. Therefore, intensification and increasing the size of human land use may have negative impacts on these taxa.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank the Environmental Trust (NSW) and the Lesslie Endowment for funding this research. Animal ethics protocol for this project was approved by the Australian National University Animal Care and Ethics Committee (protocol A2013/31). S. Pulsford was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1442-9985en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/197234
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherWileyen_AU
dc.rights© 2018 Ecological Society of Australiaen_AU
dc.sourceAustral Ecologyen_AU
dc.titleReptiles and frogs use most land cover types as habitat in a fine-grained agricultural landscapeen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue5en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage513en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage502en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationPulsford, Stephanie, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBarton, Philip, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDriscoll, D.A., Deakin Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKay, Geoffrey, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLindenmayer, David, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoremailu4437087@anu.edu.auen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidPulsford, Stephanie, u4538346en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidBarton, Philip, u4437087en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidKay, Geoffrey, u3356298en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidLindenmayer, David, u8808483en_AU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor050211 - Wildlife and Habitat Managementen_AU
local.identifier.absfor050202 - Conservation and Biodiversityen_AU
local.identifier.absseo960804 - Farmland, Arable Cropland and Permanent Cropland Flora, Fauna and Biodiversityen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB10284en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume43en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1111/aec.12587en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85042603925
local.identifier.uidSubmittedBya383154en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.wiley.com/en-gben_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
01_Pulsford_Reptiles_and_frogs_use_most_2018.pdf
Size:
560.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format